Perspectives on a good death: A comparative study of veterans and civilians
APA Citation:
Suntai, Z., Laha-Walsh, K., & Albright, D. L. (2024). Perspectives on a good death: A comparative study of veterans and civilians. Death Studies, 48(3), 276-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2023.2219641
Focus:
Veterans
Mental health
Other
Branch of Service:
Multiple branches
Military Affiliation:
Veteran
Subject Affiliation:
Veteran
Civilian
Population:
Adulthood (18 yrs & older)
Young adulthood (18 - 29 yrs)
Thirties (30 - 39 yrs)
Methodology:
Quantitative Study
Authors:
Suntai, Zainab, Laha-Walsh, Kirsten, Albright, David L.
Abstract:
This study aimed to identify any differences between veterans and non-veterans in the importance of domains of the Good Death Inventory. Participants were recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk to complete a Qualtrics survey on the importance of the 18 domains of the Good Death Inventory scale. Logistic regression models were then used to analyze any differences between veterans (n = 241) and nonveterans (n = 1151). Results showed that veterans (mostly aged 31–50, men, and White) were more likely to indicate that pursuing all treatment possible and maintaining their pride were important aspects of a good death. The results support other studies that have found military culture to be a significant factor in the way veterans view preferences at the end of life. Interventions may include increasing access to palliative care and hospice services for military members and veterans and providing education/training on end-of-life care for healthcare providers who work with this population.
Publication Type:
Article
Keywords:
death, veterans, civilians, differences, Good Death Inventory