Search Results
Publication Date
Military REACH Publications
Focus Terms
Military Branch of Service
Sample Affiliation
Age Group
Military Affiliation
Publication Type
Award Winning Publications
Research summaries convey terminology used by the scientists who authored the original research article; some terminology may not align with the federal government's mandated language for certain constructs.
A SALUTE TO OUR WOMEN SERVICE MEMBERS FOR WOMEN’S HISTORY MONTH
Women have supported the U.S. Military since our country was founded with the Revolutionary War (1775–1783), although they weren't formally recognized as Service members until 1948. Over time, women’s roles to serve our country have evolved over time, but their capability has never wavered. In this piece, we will explore the roles of women throughout our military history related to varying policies, their contributions to our country, and discuss recent research findings about women Service members. During the Revolutionary War, women found unique ways to aid in the war effort, such as mending clothing, tending to wounds, foraging for food, cooking, cleaning both laundry and cannons, and traveling alongside different militias. In addition, some women disguised themselves as men to fight on the front lines (DeSimone, 2022). Similarly, while women were not allowed to enlist in the Civil War (1861-1865), approximately 1,000 women across the Union and Confederate armies fought while disguised as men (DeSimone, 2022). One of these revolutionary women, Margaret Corbin, was the first woman to receive a military pension (Michals, 2015). In fact, throughout the Civil War, a further 20,000 women served in other ways (e.g., growing crops, sewing, laundry, collecting donations, running fundraising campaigns). But their greatest contribution was serving as nurses for the Union Army. One such volunteer, Clara Barton, went on to found the Red Cross, an influential relief organization to this day (American Red Cross, 2023). During the 20th century, women experienced a shift in the recognition of and allowance for their military service. 1901 saw the start of the U.S. Army Nurse Corps, with a total employment of 403 nurses; by 1918, that number had grown to 3,000. At the same time, a shortage of men available for clerical “yeoman” duties, such as operating telephones and radios and acting as translators, led the Navy to recruit women for these jobs. The first “yeomanettes” served the Navy between 1917 and 1918 (during WWI [1914–1918]; DeSimone, 2022). By WWII (1939–1945), the military enlisted women across all branches. The Army had the Women’s Army Auxiliary Corps and the Army’s Women Airforce Service Pilots. The Navy had Women Accepted for Volunteer Emergency Service. The Marine Corps had the Marine Corps Women’s Reserve. And the Coast Guard’s Women’s Reserve was called Semper Paratus (“Always Ready”). This was a huge victory for women during this time. Throughout WWII, some 350,000 women served the United States in non-combat roles. These roles were not without risk, though: 432 women gave their lives during the war, and a further 88 were taken as prisoners of war (DeSimone, 2022). It wasn’t until 1948 that President Harry S. Truman signed the Women’s Armed Services Integration Act into law, allowing women to serve as full, permanent Service members across the entire military. (The same year, President Truman also issued an executive order integrating the Armed Forces; in addition to desegregating the military, this order also allowed Black women to serve in all branches.) While President Truman’s order was an important step for women, it was still not a complete victory for equal opportunity; women were allowed to comprise only 2% of each branch, and there were limitations on how many women could become officers. Shortly after these acts and orders became law, U.S. involvement in the Korean War (1950–1953) saw 120,000 women serve in two types of positions: (1) those similar to the positions they served in in the past or (2) in active-duty, non-combat positions, such as military police officers and engineers. The U.S.’ involvement in the Vietnam War (1955–1975) resulted in nearly 11,000 women stationed in Vietnam, 90% of whom were nurses in the Army, Navy, and Air Force. It was during this war that President Lyndon B. Johnson allowed women to be promoted to general and flag ranks, and, by 1972, women were able to command units. And the following year, the Pentagon announced that women could remain in the military even if they were pregnant (DeSimone, 2022). Following the Korean and Vietnam Wars, women continued to pave their way in the U.S. Armed Forces, such that during the Gulf War (1990-1991), over 40,000 women deployed to combat zones, although they were still unable to serve in direct combat. Then, in 1994, President Bill Clinton rescinded the “Risk Rule,” which restricted women from serving in roles that would expose them to risks associated with direct combat (e.g., hostile fire, capture) (DeSimone, 2022). This meant that women could now serve in thousands of new positions, even those that could expose them to these risks (e.g., bomber pilot, fighter pilots) (McGrath, 2001). From the late 20th century to today, there has been a lot of progress for women in the United States Armed Forces, as well as a lot of firsts. The following is just a partial list: In 1975, Commander Paige Blok became the first woman Navy fighter pilot (Eckstein, 2019). Army Sargent Leigh Ann Hester was the first woman Soldier to be awarded the Silver Star, for bravery during a 2005 enemy ambush on her supply convoy in Iraq (DeSimone, 2022). In 2008, General Ann Dunwoody became the first woman four-star general, which happened to be for the Army (Lopez, 2012). And in 2013, Chief Karen Voorhees was the first woman Aviation Survival Technician to become Chief of the Coast Guard history (Booker, 2021). In addition to these noteworthy firsts, 2013 was also the year that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced the end of the ban on women in combat and that women Service members would be allowed to serve in direct ground combat roles. These changes took effect in 2015; women became eligible for thousands of military jobs as a result. Since then, over 100 women have graduated from the Army’s ranger school (DeSimone, 2022) and 8 have participated in the Navy SEAL officer assessment and selection process (Kime, 2022). The history of women in the U.S. Armed Forces speaks for itself, but it is worth noting that there are more women in the Forces than ever before. Since 9/11, more than 300,000 women have served in Iraq and Afghanistan since 9/11, and over 9,000 have earned Combat Action Badges. Today, women make up approximately 16% of our Armed Forces (DeSimone, 2022). The increase in women Service members makes it important to recognize not only their effects on the history of the military but also the unique experiences and challenges that women face while serving our country. One way to better understand these experiences is through research; luckily, Military REACH has an arsenal of it on women Service members. What we see in the research is similar to the history: though women are strong and resilient, they continue to face gendered challenges and have to advocate for themselves. One related and important note is that research is intended to help answer questions or find solutions to problems; therefore, research typically takes a deficits-based approach (Shea, 2021). Please keep this in mind when reading literature on the topic of women Service members. Across the literature, we have seen: Women reporting challenges to relationships, family life, marriage, pregnancy, and parenthood (Erwin, 2022; Leslie & Koblinsky, 2017; Lawrence et al., 2022). Women Service members affected disproportionately by intimate partner violence, sexual assault, sexual harassment, and military sexual trauma (Portnoy et al., 2020; Dichter et al., 2018; Breslin et al., 2022; Dardis et al., 2017) Women facing health challenges, such as posttraumatic stress disorder, emotional reactivity, depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, chronic health conditions, increased tobacco and alcohol use, and obesity (Lehavot et al, 2012; Portnoy et al., 2020; Leslie & Koblinsky, 2017) Women reporting challenges to career development and navigation within the military (Erwin, 2022). However, even in the face of these challenges, Servicewomen still have positive things to say about their military experience, including their service attributing positive meaning to their lives (Leslie & Koblinsky, 2017). Military REACH in particular has heard first-hand perspectives of women in the military through the interviews we compiled in the Research-In-Action article, “Perspectives of Service among Women Service Members and Veterans.” Clearly, women are a force to be reckoned with, and I am proud to see the progress women have made and the barriers they have overcome to serve our country! Happy Women’s History Month, Servicewomen – and, most importantly, thank you for your service.
THE REALITY OF REINTEGRATION
I recently had the privilege of teaching a group of undergraduate students about military family experiences and got to show a heartwarming video of Service members reuniting with their family members. The video was filled with shouts of joy, hugs, and happy tears as loved ones embraced each other after months of separation. Indeed, family reunions after deployments are joyous occasions, and afterwards the family goes through a process called reintegration (i.e., when family members are reunited following deployment). Although many families feel that their relationships improve during reintegration, it can also be a time of great challenges as romantic partners, parents, and children figure out how to navigate life together again. During this time, challenges can become magnified and couples may experience more ups and downs than usual. This is called _relational turbulence._ Relational turbulence is influenced by relationship uncertainty and interference. _Uncertainty_ refers to doubts about the relationship, concerns about partner roles and expectations, and/or questions about how long the relationship may last. _Interference_ is when someone feels like their goals (i.e., or something that they want) are being obstructed by their partner. For example, a newly returning Service member prematurely adopting a role, such as disciplinarian, that the at-home partner has been conducting during the deployment. These experiences can ramp up a short time after reintegration and can cause challenges in the relationships between the couple and parents and children. Couples may experience declines in emotional or sexual intimacy, feel a lack of support from their partners, and have poor communication. Children may experience more difficulties reintegrating their parent into daily life and routines. The difficulties that military families experience may also be exacerbated when a Service member or an at-home parent is dealing with mental health symptoms like anxiety, depression, or posttraumatic stress disorder. #### So, what can couples and families do to better manage the challenges of reintegration? 1. First, realize that it is normal for families to stumble during the reintegration phase and become frustrated with reorganizing family routines. Interpreting these challenges as signals of doom for the relationship may contribute to more doubt about the future, which may further complicate the reintegration process. 2. Second, communicate openly and have clear expectations during reintegration. This can include covering topics like which roles will be resumed by the Service member and when those changes will occur, areas of doubt or concerns about the relationship that the couple would like to address, how much about the deployment the Service member wants to share with their family, and any plans to seek support or services. It may be helpful for the Service member to take time to reconnect with their children before adopting or re-adopting authoritative parental roles. 3. Third, recognize that mental health challenges are normal, and seek resources to build a stronger base for the family. Depression, anxiety, or posttraumatic stress disorder are related to more relational turbulence and reintegration challenges. These challenges are treatable and manageable, especially if addressed with support early in the reintegration period. Consider going to see a counselor as a couple or family to navigate mental health and relational challenges at the same time. Reintegration is a normal part of the military deployment cycle, and it is normal for families to experience emotional highs and lows during this time. Read more about this experience in our [library](https://militaryreach.auburn.edu/reachlibrary.jsp) and be sure to seek out any desired resources to successfully manage challenges that arise. ##### References [Knobloch, L. K., Knobloch-Fedders, L. M., & Yorgason, J. B. (2019). Mental health symptoms and the reintegration difficulty of military couples following deployment: A longitudinal application of the relational turbulence model. _Journal of Clinical Psychology, 75(4)_, 742-765.](https://aub.ie/MilitaryREACH-Knobloch19TRIP) [Link to Source](https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22734) [Knobloch, L. K., Basinger, E D., & Theiss, J. A. (2018). Relational turbulence and perceptions of partner support during reintegration after military deployment. _Journal of Applied Communication Research, 46(1)_, 52-73.](https://aub.ie/MilitaryREACH-Knobloch18TRIP) [Link to Source](https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2017.1409906) [Knobloch, L. K., Knobloch-Fedders, L. M., Yorgason, J. B., Ebata, A. T., & McGlaughlin, P. C (2017). Military children’s difficulty with reintegration after deployment: A relational turbulence model perspective. _Journal of Family Psychology, 31(5)_, 542-552. doi:10.1037/fam0000299](https://aub.ie/MilitaryREACH-KnoblochEtAl2017) [Link to Source](https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000299) [Knobloch, L. K., & Theiss, J. A. (2012). Experiences of U.S. military couples during the post-deployment transition: Applying the relational turbulence model. _Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(4)_, 423–450. doi:10.1177/0265407511431186](https://aub.ie/MilitaryREACH-Knobloch2012) [Link to Source](https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407511431186) [Knobloch, L. K., Ebata, A. T., McGlaughlin, P. C., & Theiss, J. A. (2013). Generalized anxiety and relational uncertainty as predictors of topic avoidance during reintegration following military deployment. _Communication Monographs, 80(4)_, 452-477. doi:10.1080/03637751.2013.828159](https://aub.ie/MilitaryREACH-Knobloch2013) [Link to Source](https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2013.828159) [Knobloch, L. K., Pusateri, K. B., Ebata, A. T., & McGlaughlin, P. C. (2014). Communicative experiences of military youth during a parent’s return home from deployment. _Journal of Family Communication, 14(4)_, 291-309. doi:10.1080/15267431.2014.945701](https://aub.ie/MilitaryREACH-Knobloch2014) [Link to Source](https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2014.945701) [Knobloch, L. K., Basinger, E. D., Wehrman, E. C., Ebata, A. T., & McGlaughlin, P. C. (2016). Communication of military couples during deployment and reunion: Changes, challenges, benefits, and advice. _Journal of Family Communication, 16_ (2), 160-179. doi:10.1080/15267431.2016.1146723](https://aub.ie/MilitaryREACH-KnoblochEtAl2016) [Link to Source](https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2016.1146723) [Knobloch, L. K., McAninch, K. G., Abendschein, B., Ebata, A. T., & McGlaughlin, P. C. (2016). Relational turbulence among military couples after reunion following deployment. _Personal Relationships, 23_(4), 742-758. doi:10.1111/pere.12148](https://aub.ie/MilitaryREACH-Knobloch2016) [Link to Source](https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12148) [Theiss, J. A., & Knobloch, L. K. (2013). A relational turbulence model of military service members' relational communication during reintegration. _Journal of Communication, 63_(6), 1109–1129. doi:10.1111/jcom.12059](https://aub.ie/MilitaryREACH-Theiss2013) [Link to Source](https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12059) [Knobloch-Fedders, L. M., Knobloch, L. K., Scott, S., & Fiore, H. (2020). Relationship changes of military couples during reintegration: A longitudinal analysis. _Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37_(7), 2145-2165.](https://aub.ie/MilitaryREACH-KF2020) [Link to Source](https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520917461)