Contrasting ecological contexts among treatment-seeking military sexual assault survivors: Consideration of relationships with sexual and gender minority identification
Paulson, J. L., Florimbio, A. R., Rogers, T. A., Hartl Majcher, J., Bennett, D. C., & Sexton, M. B. (2024). Contrasting ecological contexts among treatment-seeking military sexual assault survivors: Consideration of relationships with sexual and gender minority identification. Psychological Services, 21(1), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000656
Abstract Created by REACH
The social-ecological model suggests that there are both risk and protective factors in every “level” of our environment (e.g., individual, interpersonal, and community). In a sample of Veterans seeking mental health treatment for military sexual trauma (N = 493), this study explored risk and protective factors at different social-ecological levels and examined whether risk and protective factors differed between sexual and gender minority (SGM) Veterans and non-SGM Veterans. Veterans seeking treatment from a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) clinic between 2009–2019 (n = 63 SGM; n = 430 non-SGM) self-reported the presence of risk and protective factors at the individual (i.e., financial sufficiency, spiritual beliefs), interpersonal (i.e., social support system, exposure to interpersonal violence), and community (i.e., housing instability) levels. In general, SGM Veterans had a harder time making ends meet (i.e., financial sufficiency) and experienced more housing instability than non-SGM Veterans.
Research summaries convey terminology used by the scientists who authored the original research article; some terminology may not align with the federal government's mandated language for certain constructs.
Cookie Preferences
We use cookies to enhance your browsing experience. Please review our Privacy Statement for more information.
Necessary cookies: Essential for the website to function properly.
Analytics cookies: Help us understand how visitors interact with our website.