(334) 844-3299
MilitaryREACH@auburn.edu
Detailed Record
Share this Article

Evaluation of the recovery engagement and coordination for health – veterans enhanced treatment suicide risk modeling clinical program in the Veterans Health Administration

APA Citation:

McCarthy, J.F., Cooper, S.A., Dent, K.R., Eagan, A.E., Matarazzo, B.B., Hannemann, C.M., Reger, M.A., Landes, S.J., Trafton, J.A., Schoenbaum, M., & Katz, I.R. (2021). Evaluation of the recovery engagement and coordination for health-veterans enhanced treatment suicide risk modeling clinical program in the Veterans Health Administration. JAMA Network Open, 4(10), e2129900. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.29900

Focus:

Veterans
Mental health

Branch of Service:

Multiple branches

Military Affiliation:

Veteran

Subject Affiliation:

Veteran

Population:

Young adulthood (18 - 29 yrs)
Adulthood (18 yrs & older)
Thirties (30 - 39 yrs)
Middle age (40 - 64 yrs)

Methodology:

Quantitative Study

Authors:

McCarthy, John F., Cooper, Samantha A., Dent, Kallisse R., Eagan, Aaron E., Matarazzo, Bridget B., Hannemann, Claire M., Reger, Mark A., Landes, Sara J., Trafton, Jodie A., Schoenbaum, Michael, Katz, Ira R.

Abstract:

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented a national clinical program using a suicide risk prediction algorithm, Recovery Engagement and Coordination for Health–Veterans Enhanced Treatment (REACH VET), in which clinicians facilitate care enhancements for individuals identified in local top 0.1% suicide risk tiers. Evaluation studies are needed.To determine associations with treatment engagement, health care utilization, suicide attempts, safety plan documentation, and 6-month mortality.This cohort study used triple differences analyses comparing 6-month changes in outcomes after vs before program entry for individuals entering the REACH VET program (March 2017-December 2018) vs a similarly identified top 0.1% suicide risk tier cohort from prior to program initiation (March 2014-December 2015), adjusting for trends across subthreshold cohorts. Subcohort analyses (including individuals from March 2017-June 2018) evaluated difference-in-differences for cause-specific mortality using death certificate data. The subthreshold cohorts included individuals in the top 0.3% to 0.1% suicide risk tier, below the threshold for REACH VET eligibility, from the concurrent REACH VET period and from the pre–REACH VET period. Data were analyzed from December 2019 through September 2021.REACH VET–designated clinicians treatment reevaluation and outreach for care enhancements, including safety planning, increased monitoring, and interventions to enhance coping.Process outcomes included VHA scheduled, completed, and missed appointments; mental health visits; and safety plan documentation and documentation within 6 months for individuals without plans within the prior 2 years. Clinical outcomes included mental health admissions, emergency department visits, nonfatal suicide attempts, and all-cause, suicide, and nonsuicide external-cause mortality.A total of 173 313 individuals (mean [SD] age, 51.0 [14.7] years; 161 264 [93.1%] men and 12 049 [7.0%] women) were included in analyses, including 40 816 individuals eligible for REACH VET care and 36 604 individuals from the pre–REACH VET period in the top 0.1% of suicide risk. The REACH VET intervention was associated with significant increases in completed outpatient appointments (adjusted triple difference [ATD], 0.31; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.55) and proportion of individuals with new safety plans (ATD, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.10) and reductions in mental health admissions (ATD, −0.08; 95% CI, −0.10 to −0.05), emergency department visits (ADT, −0.03; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.01), and suicide attempts (ADT, −0.05; 95% CI, −0.06 to −0.03). Subcohort analyses did not identify differences in suicide or all-cause mortality (eg, age-and-sex-adjusted difference-in-difference for suicide mortality, 0.0007; 95% CI, −0.0006 to 0.0019).These findings suggest that REACH VET implementation was associated with greater treatment engagement and new safety plan documentation and fewer mental health admissions, emergency department visits, and suicide attempts. Clinical programs using risk modeling may be effective tools to support care enhancements and risk reduction.

Publisher/Sponsoring Organization:

JAMA Network

Publication Type:

Article

Author Affiliation:

Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs, JFM
Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs, SAC
Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs, KRD
Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs, AEE
Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs, CMH
Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs, JAT
Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs, IRK
Rocky Mountain Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, BBM
VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, MAR
South Central Mental Illness Research Education Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs, SJL
National Institute of Mental Health, MS

Keywords:

veteran, healthcare, suicide risk

Sponsors:

Veterans Affairs Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention

This website uses cookies to improve the browsing experience of our users. Please review Auburn University’s Privacy Statement for more information. Accept & Close